CMS has added new language to C9761, and AHA Coding Clinic reinforces the central coding question: What service was actually performed?
Endoscopic kidney stone procedures can look similar on the claim while involving different technologies, documentation, and payment pathways. That is why the choice among CPT® 52353¹, CPT® 52356², newly created HCPCS Level II C8014³, and HCPCS Level II C97614 deserves careful attention.
As AAPC previously explained, the significant payment differential between C9761 and CPT 52353/56 and C9761 and C8014 increases the compliance risk when a facility reports C9761 without documentation clearly supporting the higher-level service. The financial stakes also mean that Medicare and commercial payers may scrutinize the operative report, device used, and work performed—not just the code selected.
These two changes create confusion about whether every ureteroscope with a suction function supports C9761. In its August 31, 2026, comment letter on the CY 2027 OPPS/ASC proposed rule, Calyxo requested clarification and asked CMS to define “integrated” in functional, documentation-based terms and to distinguish C9761 from both the newly created C8014 pathway and the existing CPT 52353/52356 pathway.
This can include a suction-capable ureteroscope used to:
AHA Coding Clinic for HCPCS, Third Quarter 2026, addresses the C9761 revision and reinforces a documentation-based distinction between device capability and the service actually performed. The publication explains that C8014 should be assigned when the documentation supports use of a suction-enabled ureteral access sheath, while C9761 requires documentation that the qualifying device performed the steerable vacuum aspiration.
This guidance comports with the clarifications Calyxo requested from CMS: a functional, documentation-based boundary between C8014 and C9761, rather than a code assignment based on device capability alone.
The AHA Coding Clinic article states:
“The documentation [for C9761] must support that the device [i.e., the steerable ureteral catheter or suction-integrated ureteroscope] was used to perform steerable vacuum aspiration of the kidney, collecting system, ureter, bladder, and/or urethra, as applicable, as described by the HCPCS Level II code descriptor.”
This guidance reinforces that the mere presence of a qualifying device is not sufficient; the record must show that the device itself performed the described aspiration. AHA Coding Clinic does not specifically address the DISS combined with a suction-enabled ureteral access sheath scenario. Applying the AHA documentation principle, however, if the suction-enabled ureteral access sheath performs the aspiration while DISS is used for visualization, lithotripsy, irrigation, or limited dust clearance, the procedure is more consistent with C8014 than C9761.
The operative note should make the coding pathway clear. For a potential C9761 case, documentation should identify:
AHA Coding Clinic’s Q3 2026 guidance strengthens this framework by stating that documentation must show the device performed the steerable vacuum aspiration described by C9761. It therefore reinforces the need to distinguish a qualifying C9761 service from limited suction functions or a case in which a suction-enabled access sheath provides the procedure-defining evacuation.
MA00234.B